November 12, 2013
In the summer of 2010, husband-and-wife paleobiologist team Z. Jack Tseng and
Juan Liu traveled to the Zanda Basin in western Tibet with a group of
colleagues. The remote area, a week’s drive from Beijing and near the
border of Pakistan and China, is “basically badlands everywhere, with
deeply cut valleys throughout,” Tseng says.
To explore the valleys, the team drove up dirt trail after dirt trail
before coming upon a dense patch of fossils sticking out of the ground
halfway up a hill. “In the little concentration of fossils, there were
lots of limb bones from antelopes and horses obscuring everything else,”
says Tseng, who was then a graduate student at USC and is now with the American Museum of Natural History.
“It wasn’t until we started lifting things up, one by one, that we saw
the top of a skull, and we thought, from the shape, that it looked
something like a cat.”
After a few years of analysis, Tseng’s team has discovered that the
skull doesn’t belong to any old cat. As they’ve documented in a study published today in Proceedings of the Royal Society B,
the skull and six associated fossilized jawbone fragments are the first
evidence of a newly discovered species, which they’ve called Panthera blytheae. The discovery represents the oldest “big cat” (a group that includes large predatory cats like lions, jaguars, tigers and leopards) ever found by a wide margin.
The sediments that make up the basin as a whole range from 6 million
to 400,000 years in age, so the group dated the fossil by analyzing the
age of the particular rock layers it was buried in. This involved using
techniques of magnetostratigraphy, in which scientists analyze the magnetic orientation of the rocks and compare it to known reversals of the Earth’s magnetic field.
This method can only provide rough estimates for an item’s age, but it
revealed that the skull is between 4.10 and 5.95 million years old.
Previously, the oldest known big cat fossils—a number of tooth fragments
found in Tanzania—were 3.6 million years old.
The new find fills a gap in the evolutionary record of big cats. By
analyzing the DNA of living species, scientists had previously estimated
that big cats had split from the Felinae
subfamily—which includes smaller wild cats, like cougars, lynxes, along
with domestic cats—about 6.37 million years ago. The very existence of P. blytheae confirms that the split happened prior to when this big cat roamed.
But how much earlier? The find could suggest, Tsang says, that big
cats branched off from smaller cats much farther back than thought. By
comparing the skull’s characteristics with fossils from other extinct
big cats, the anatomy of living cat species, and DNA samples taken from
both living cats and a few recently extinct, Ice Age-era species (known
as cave lions),
the researchers assembled a new evolutionary family tree for all big
cats. Using known rates of anatomical changes over time and the observed
anatomy of P. blytheae, they projected backwards, and
estimated that the earliest big cats likely branched off from the
Felinae subfamily between 10 and 11 million years ago.
The new fossil also solves a geological mystery. Previously, using
DNA analysis of all living big cats and mapping the the fossils
excavated from various sites around the world, researchers had
determined it was most likely that their common ancestor had lived in
Asia. The oldest known specimens, however, were found in Africa. The new
species provides the first direct evidence that central Asia was indeed
the big cats’ ancestral home, at least as far back as the current
fossil record currently goes.
From the fragmented fossils, it’s hard to know much about the extinct
species’ behavior and lifestyle, but the researchers were able to make
some basic extrapolations from the skull’s anatomy. “It’s not a huge
cat, like a lion or a tiger, but closer to a leopard,” Tsang says. The
creature’s habitat was likely similar to the current Tibetan plateau, so
Tseng speculates that, like the snow leopards that currently live in
the area, this species did not hunt on the open plains, but rather
cliffs and valleys. Tooth wear patterns also suggest similarities with
current snow leopards—the rear teeth, likely used for cutting soft
tissue, remain sharp, whereas the front teeth are heavily worn, perhaps
reflecting their use in prying open carcasses and picking meat off
bones.
Tseng says that he and colleagues plan to return to the area to
search for more fossils that could help enlighten us on the evolutionary
history of big cats. “The gap still isn’t completely filled yet,” he
says. “We need to find older big cats to put the picture together.”
source
See also:
http://news.sciencemag.org/biology/2013/11/ancient-cat-may-reshape-feline-family-tree
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/nov/13/oldest-big-cat-fossil-tibet-predator-asia
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn24561-himalayan-fossils-point-to-asian-origin-of-big-cats.html?cmpid=RSS|NSNS|2012-GLOBAL|online-news#.UoODL-JGaOB
No comments:
Post a Comment