Please stop what you’re doing—which, presumably, is reading this
article—and do a quick Google image search. You don’t even have to type
anything—just click here. (I promise, there’s nothing unsavory at the other end, but its phasers are set to giggle.)
Ladies and gentlemen, what you’re seeing is the flehmen response,
a scent-sucking mechanism employed by many mammalian species, and I’d
argue the best dang animal-related search on the Internet.
Recent years have gifted us with the nope octopus, Game of Goats, and doge-speak.
And while all of these cultural phenomena are hilarious in their own
right, they’re all heavily influenced by the context we humans have
provided. For instance, dramatic chipmunk is a lot less dramatic if you take away his music (and his light sabers, monocles, James Bond filters, etc).
But the flehmen response is au natural. The goats and tigers
and tapirs you see here have not been provoked in any way. They do not
have peanut butter on the roofs of their mouths, nor have they been
trained to respond to a cue. They’re just animals doing animal stuff—and
looking like a gang of proper goofs while doing it.
So, what the actual flehmen is going on here?
Also known as the lip-curl, the gape response, or more simply, funny
cat face, the flehmen response is a behavior some animals use to
investigate a smell. You can witness flehmening in everything from the house cat on your lap to rhinos, rams, elk, llamas, and giraffes.
John Bradshaw, an anthrozoologist and author of myriad books about animals,
says it’s easy to mistake the behavior for aggression, since the animal
bares its teeth as it scrunches up its face. But what’s actually
happening is that the cat or moose is physically opening up two tiny
ducts on the roof of its mouth behind its incisors.
“If you’ve got an older dog—supposing it’s a friendly animal—you can
pry its face apart and look up and see them,” says Bradshaw. “The ducts
are a couple of millimeters wide, and in their normal state they look
like little, flat slits.”
Officially called the nasopalatine canals, these ducts go up through
the roof of the mouth and connect with something called the vomeronasal organ
(aka the Jacobson’s organ). Bradshaw explains that this is a sort of
accessory olfactory bulb, with completely different neurons than the
ones associated with the sense of smell.
In fact, scientists think that the information processed by this
organ lies somewhere in between the sense of smell and taste. The ducts
are full of saliva, so whatever molecules get trapped in there have to
be physically pumped up to the vomeronasal organ with special muscles.
Whereas an animal can’t help but automatically take in smells when it
breathes through its nose, the flehmen response is a voluntary action,
like swallowing.
So, why do buffaloes and hedgehogs require a spare form of sniffing?
And aren’t dogs already supposed to have some of the most superpowered
schnozzes in the biz?
Interestingly, Bradshaw says that cats may have the better end of the
deal when it comes to vomeronasal organs. The average tabby has 30
different types of receptors up in there while your hound dog has just
9. “Presumably, if you’ve got three times as many receptors, you can discriminate between a lot more things,” says Bradshaw.
In other words, when a cat goes into full flehmen, it isn’t just sniffing. It’s sniffing in high resolution.
But if we really want to talk about super sniffers, we need to look at the meek. In Bradshaw’s book Cat Sense,
he writes that mice have hundreds of receptor types. “The odorants mice
pick up regulate reproduction, as well as enabling recognition of every
other mouse in the neighborhood from its unique odor ‘fingerprint.’ ”
Most animals, and this is true for cats especially, seem to use their
flehmen response when investigating smells from other members of their
own species. This means the vomeronasal organ is important for mating,
marking territory, and intraspecific communication.
But this isn’t a hard and fast rule. One study conducted with Saanen goats
found that the animals used the flehmen response to investigate urine
from 15 different mammal species, three bird species, and two reptile
species. In the trial, the goats seemed to flehmen more intensely in
contact with the urine of farm animals than with that of zoo animals.
But who knows, perhaps goats just flehmen anytime they get sprayed in
the face with urine. (I’d probably make a funny face, too.)
By the way, not all animals that have vomeronasal organs perform the
flehmen response. Elephants do a pseudo-version of the behavior, but
supplement it by physically bringing smells into contact with their
ducts, which are on the top of their mouth cavities. So if you ever see
an elephant at the zoo touching a puddle of urine with its trunk and
then putting that same yucky trunk into its mouth—it’s not eating the
urine, it’s flehmening it.
Similarly, snakes have no need to snarl. They transfer scent molecules
directly to the organ using their forked tongues, which fit into those
tiny mouth pits like a plug into a socket.
If your tongue has been searching the roof of your mouth for holes,
fear not. Humans lack these special ducts and the vomeronasal organs to
go with them. In fact, that’s probably why you’ve never heard of the
flehmen response—it’s not something we can do.
But this probably wasn’t always the case—our ancestors certainly
flehmened, and you can see evidence of it during development. When the
human fetus forms, it actually sets out on a path toward building a
vomerosonal organ. “But then at some point it just fades away and disappears,” says Bradshaw.
When the baby is born, the only remaining clues are a pair of pits at
the bottom of our nostrils where the ducts used to connect to the
organ—a nonfunctional token of our evolutionary past.
source
source
No comments:
Post a Comment