Friday, March 20, 2015

State seeks to offset cattle lost to panthers

CHAD GILLIS,

Ranchers could be key to restoring Florida's growing panther population.

A University of Florida study on panther depredation on livestock says farmers are more concerned about coyotes than they are big cats, and most of the farmers who responded are in favor of preserving the Sunshine State's official animal.

"Rancher acceptance and support of panther recovery is critical its success because cattle ranches in Florida typically support a mosaic of different natural land cover types that provide suitable habitat for panthers and other wildlife," the UF report reads.

The state has been working on a program to compensate ranchers for cattle lost to panthers, and the study says compensating farmers for the amount of panther habitat they maintain could be the most effective way to approach the issue.

This latest survey was conducted by Caitlin Jacobs with the university's Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation and Martin Main with UF's Florida Sea Grant.

Incentivisation, the study says, could be the best way to protect both panthers and livestock. This type of compensation program would help offset livestock lost to panthers and encourage property owners to maintain panther habitat, which includes some agriculture lands.

The study was conducted to evaluate the perceived risk of panthers and other predators while also measuring the support for panther recovery. Internet surveys were sent to more than 1,900 Florida cattle ranchers, with 90 ranchers starting the survey and 70 completing it. Eight of those respondents said they were against Florida panther conservation; twenty-five said they were neither for or against conservation; and 43 said they supported or strongly support saving Florida's panthers.

The numbers translate into 56 percent of farmers who responded being in favor of panther protection. That's much less importance, the study says, than the general public places on big cat conservation (91 percent).

Ranchers who responded said they were no more concerned about panthers than they are alligators, vultures, bobcats and black bears.

The survey also asked farmers north of the Caloosahatchee River if they'd be concerned about biologists releasing females in that area of the state. Males readily travel north of the river, but females have been reluctant to move into central and north Florida.

The lack of females prevents panthers from breeding in those areas and expanding their current range, which is currently centered around The Big Cypress area.

The panther population was thought to consists of a few dozen individuals in the 1980s and '90s. The state introduced female Texas cougars in the late '90s as a way to increase the genetic variation of the Florida panther, which crossbred with the cougars hundreds of years ago as their range was connected across the Southeastern United States.

-- Compiled by Chad Gillis 

source 

No comments: